Furman

Furman v. Zempleo, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20243:23-cv-01777California4,316 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 WILLIAM FURMAN, Individually and Case No.: 23-cv-01777-AJB-DEB for Others Similarly Situated,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

Plaintiff, MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT v. APPROVAL

ZEMPLEO, INC.,

(Doc. No. 32) Defendant. 18 19 Before the Court is a joint motion to approval the parties’ settlement of Plaintiffs’ claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”).1 (Doc. No. 32.) Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1, the Court finds the matter suitable for determination on the papers. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the parties’ joint motion.

25 “Plaintiffs” refers to Mr. William Furman (“Mr. Furman”), who initially filed the Complaint, and the twelve individuals who filed written consent forms to opt-in. (See Doc. Nos. 1 (Complaint); 3 (consent of James M. Bass, David Bean, Patsy J. Earnhardt, Scott Hicks, Thomas M. Lassiter, Frank Meyer, Phung Nguyuen, David Bryant Puckett, and Richard…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.