Ochoa

Ochoa v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20243:23-cv-02058California378 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCUS ANTONIO OCHOA, Case No. 23-cv-2058-MMA (MMP)

CDCR #F-81217

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION FOR FAILURE TO vs. PROSECUTE

JAMES HILL, DR. JOHN HODGES, DR.

LUZVIMINDA SAIDRO, JANE DOE,

MITCHELL, Defendants. 18 November 6, 2023, Marcus Antonio Ochoa (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. No. 1. The Court granted Plaintiff IFP status and sua sponte dismissed the original complaint for failure to state a claim. Doc. No. 3. After an extension of time, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on April 1, 2024. Doc. No. 6. The Court dismissed the FAC because Plaintiff again failed to state a claim. Doc. No. 7. The Court gave Plaintiff 45 days, or until October 10, 2024, to file a Second Amended Complaint. Id. at 13. The time for Plaintiff to respond to the Court’s Order has passed and the Court has 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.