Ortiz

(PC) Rios v. Ortiz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20241:23-cv-01595California1,366 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE MIGUEL RIOS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01595-HBK (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY

BALANCE OF FILING FEE OR FILE

v. UPDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION ORTIZ, JANUARY 9, 2025 DEADLINE Defendant. 16 17 18 On December 6, 2024, Plaintiff Jose Miguel Rios, who is proceeding pro se, filed a Notice of Change of Address indicating he was recently released from CDCR custody. (See Doc. No. 26). Because Plaintiff initiated this action while a prisoner and was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (Doc. No. 4), he is “required to pay the full amount of a filing fee” under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Based on Plaintiff’s “certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for . . . the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint,” 28 U.S.C. § 26 1 The Court also independently has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.