Rich-Banales

(PS) Chand v. Rich-Banales

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20242:23-cv-01583California11,366 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHARON S. CHAND, No. 2:23-cv-1583 DC SCR (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ALTA CALIFORNIA REGIONAL CENTER, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, Sharon S. Chand, filed this action pro se and paid the filing fee. The case was accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Pending before the undersign is Defendants’ motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) under Rule 12(b)(6). ECF No. 5. For the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends dismissal of Plaintiff’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) claims against all Defendants, Plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1981 claims against Defendants Crick and Rich-Banales, Plaintiff’s § 1981 hostile work environment and non-employment-based claims against Defendants Bonnet and Alta California Regional Center (“ACRC”), and all claims against ACRC’s Board of Directors. The undersigned further recommends granting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.