Karl Hansen v. Elon Musk
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 10, 202423-15296California9,117 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KARL HANSEN, No. 23-15296
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-00413- v. LRH-CSD
ELON MUSK; TESLA MOTORS,
INC.; U.S. SECURITIES OPINION
ASSOCIATES, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted May 14, 2024 Pasadena, California
Filed December 10, 2024
Before: Daniel P. Collins, Holly A. Thomas, and Anthony D. Johnstone, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge H.A. Thomas; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Collins SUMMARY *
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
The panel affirmed the district court’s order dismissing a complaint alleging whistleblower retaliation claims. Karl Hansen sued Tesla, Inc., its CEO, and U.S. Security Associates, alleging that they retaliated against him for reporting misconduct at Tesla. The district court ordered most of Hansen’s claims to arbitration, except his claim under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX). The district court confirmed…