Cir

Charles Kinney v. Cir

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 10, 202422-70265California1,341 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 10 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHARLES KINNEY, No. 22-70265

Petitioner-Appellant, Tax Ct. No. 17664-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL

REVENUE,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from a Decision of the United States Tax Court

Submitted December 10, 2024**

Before: BENNETT, BADE, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner-Appellant Charles Kinney appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s

order, following a bench trial, upholding the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s

determination of income tax deficiencies for tax year 2016. We have jurisdiction

under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1). We review the Tax Court’s legal conclusions de

novo and its factual findings for clear error. Cooper v. Comm’r, 877 F.3d 1086,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See FED. R. APP. P. 34(a)(2)(C). 1090 (9th Cir. 2017). We review for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.