Andrew Lopez v. D. Thomas
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 10, 202423-15255California594 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
DEC 10 2024
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANDREW RICK LOPEZ, No. 23-15255
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:21-cv-07136-PJH
v.
MEMORANDUM*
D. C. THOMAS, Correctional Officer,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 10, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
California prisoner Andrew Lopez appeals pro se from the district court’s
judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison personnel violated his
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). rights during a fight with another inmate and during the ensuing disciplinary
proceedings. We affirm.