Sorto-Portales

Sorto-Portales v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 10, 202423-3302California892 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 10 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NICOLE ALE SORTO-PORTALES, No. 23-3302 Agency No. Petitioner, A212-974-839 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 21, 2024** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: TASHIMA, M. SMITH, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Nicole Ale Sorto-Portales (Sorto-Portales), a native and citizen of

Honduras, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of her

motion to reopen removal proceedings. We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). reopen for abuse of discretion, Greenwood v. Garland, 36 F.4th 1232, 1235 (9th

Cir. 2022) (citing Nababan v. Garland, 18 F.4th 1090, 1094 (9th Cir. 2021)),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.