Morales-Guzman

Morales-Guzman v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 10, 202423-3576California703 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

DEC 10 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

REMIGIO MORALES-GUZMAN, No. 23-3576 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-318-805 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 3, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: BEA, OWENS, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Remigio Morales-Guzman petitions for review of a decision by

the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that dismissed his appeal of an

immigration judge’s denial of his applications for nondiscretionary withholding of

removal, 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3) and 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16, and protection under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Convention Against Torture (CAT), 8 C.F.R. §§ 1208.16–18. We have jurisdiction

to review the petition pursuant to 8…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.