Mendoza Castillo De Carrillo v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 10, 202424-84California1,071 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 10 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIRIAM R MENDOZA CASTILLO DE No. 24-84 CARRILLO; K.R.C.M., Agency Nos.

A216-637-561

Petitioners, A216-637-562 v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 6, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners, Miriam Mendoza Castillo de Carrillo (“Castillo de Carrillo”) and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). her minor daughter K.R.C.M., are Guatemalan nationals.1 They petition for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of their applications for

asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.