People v. Wiseman CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I.
INTRODUCTION
The trial court rejected defendant and appellant Chester Ray Wiseman’s claim that
the prosecution had improperly destroyed potentially exculpatory evidence, and found
true that defendant had violated his parole conditions by being in possession of two
knives. The court thereafter revoked defendant’s parole and sentenced him to 180 days
in county jail. On appeal, defendant contends the trial court erred in denying his claim
that the prosecution had destroyed the surveillance video, and thus the order revoking his
parole should be reversed. We disagree and affirm the judgment.
II.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On October 17, 2023, B.C. and J.C., both parole agents, contacted defendant, a
parolee, at defendant’s cardboard, fully enclosed homeless encampment behind the state
parole office in Victorville. They contacted defendant because his encampment was
blocking the back door. When he was released from prison, defendant had signed and
indicated he understood the terms and conditions of his parole. Among other terms and
conditions of parole, one of defendant’s parole conditions prohibited him from possessing
any knife with a blade longer than two…