Li

Filed 12/10/24 Li v. Uber Technologies CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

YINGNAN LI,

Plaintiff and Respondent, A168618 v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., (City & County of San Francisco Defendant and Appellant. Super. Ct. No. CPF23517965)

Yingnan Li initiated arbitration against her former employer, Uber Technologies, Inc. (Uber), alleging gender discrimination and retaliation. The arbitrator issued an award granting Uber’s motion for summary judgment based upon the statute of limitations. Li filed a petition to vacate the award. The trial court vacated the award as to Li’s termination claims based on the arbitrator’s legal error in ruling the claims were untimely,…