K.S.

K.S. v. G.B. CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 10, 2024H051065California3,545 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bromberg, J.

I. BACKGROUND

A. The Parties’ 2019 Divorce K.S. and G.B. were married in 1975, they separated in 2018, and in 2019 their marriage was terminated. B. The Original DVRO In February 2022, K.S. requested a DVRO against G.B. She alleged that G.B. had engaged in “[c]ontinual unwanted contact after repeated notice it is unwanted,” which inflicted emotional harm on her and disturbed her peace. Among other things, K.S. alleged that G.B. had sent a letter accusing her of having an affair 40 years ago with one of his friends and questioning the paternity of their daughter A.S. K.S. also requested that the DVRO protect A.S., A.S.’s husband D.S., and their two children. K.S. alleged that G.B. had repeatedly contacted A.S. and her family despite their requests not to contact them, that there had been two prior DVRO cases against G.B., and that G.B. had entered into a civil no-contact/stay away agreement with “our family,”2 which was effective from September 2019 through October 2021. Nevertheless, G.B. allegedly continued to send letters and e-mails to the family and, in November 2021 after the no-contact agreement expired, again began contacting K.S. The trial court issued a temporary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.