Stephen Redd v. Patricia Guerrero

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 11, 202421-55464California12,104 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-55464

STEPHEN MORELAND REDD,

individually and on behalf of all D.C. No. 2:16-cv- others similarly situated 01540-DMG-PJ Plaintiff-Appellant,

ORDER

v.

PATRICIA GUERRERO, Chief Justice of California; KIMBERLY MENNINGER, Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Orange

Defendants-Appellees.

Filed December 11, 2024

Before: Marsha S. Berzon, Richard C. Tallman, and Morgan Christen, Circuit Judges.

Order; Statement by Judge Berzon; Dissent by Judge Bennett SUMMARY *

Procedural Due Process/Prisoner Civil Rights

The panel issued an order granting appellees’ request to dismiss this appeal as moot, denying appellant’s motion for substitution of a party, denying appellees’ request to vacate the panel’s decision, and denying as moot appellees’ petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. Stephen Redd, a California state prisoner sentenced to death, alleged that state officials violated his procedural due process rights by failing to appoint postconviction relief counsel as required by California law. In October 2023, the panel issued an opinion holding that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.