O'Neil

United States v. O'Neil

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 11, 202424-811California793 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 11 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-811 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:22-cr-00153-AKB-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

ERIC J. O’NEIL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho Amanda K. Brailsford, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 2, 2024** Portland, Oregon

Before: TASHIMA, NGUYEN, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Eric O’Neil pleaded guilty to one count of bank fraud after participating in a

scheme to fraudulently apply for and receive loan assistance through the Paycheck

Protection Program (“PPP”), which was designed to support small businesses

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). during COVID-19. He now appeals the district court’s decision to apply the

sophisticated-means enhancement under United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.