Ortiz-Infante

Ortiz-Infante v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 11, 202423-3817California1,178 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 11 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LORENS DEL MILAGRO ORTIZ- No. 23-3817 INFANTE; MATIAS MANUEL LAZO- Agency Nos.

ORTIZ; VALENTINA DEL MILAGRO A220-592-029

LAZO-ORTIZ; RUTHAMARIA JAMILE A220-490-482

LAZO-ORTIZ; RUTH MARIANA

A220-490-483

OCHOA-LAZO,

A220-490-481

A220-490-484

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 5, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: M. SMITH and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and WU, District Judge***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable George H. Wu, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.