White

White v. Hay CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 11, 2024G062882California3,958 words

Opinion

Opinion

Motoike, J.

Filed 12/11/24 White v. Hay CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

MARK WHITE,

Plaintiff and Appellant, G062882

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2021- 01199239) SHELDON HAY et al.,

OPINION

Defendants and Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Melissa R. McCormick, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of James Migler and James Migler for Plaintiff and Appellant. Tressler, Karl P. Schlecht and Jihoon Kim for Defendants and Respondents. Plaintiff Mark White appeals from the judgment entered after the trial court granted the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Sheldon and Michael Hay.1 White alleged, in July 2003, Sheldon orally promised to transfer a house to White…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.