Kaur
Kaur v. Dual Arch International
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 11/15/24; Certified for Partial Pub. 12/11/24 (order attached)
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
JASWINDER KAUR et al.,
F086272
Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 20CV-03476) v.
DUAL ARCH INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., OPINION Defendants and Respondents.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Merced County. Brian McCabe, Judge. HBG Law and Harry B. Gill for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Fores Macko Johnston & Chartrand, Cory B. Chartrand and Megan D. Johnson for Defendant and Respondent, Dual Arch International, Inc. -ooOoo- This matter stems from a foreclosure sale that was successfully challenged and set aside by appellants Jaswinder Kaur (Kaur) and Parkash Pabla (Pabla) (collectively “Appellants”). On the first day of trial, the trial court granted a renewed motion for nonsuit as to all remaining claims alleged against respondent Dual Arch International, Inc. (“DAII”). Appellants raise a single issue in this appeal: Did the trial court err by granting DAII’s renewed motion for nonsuit? We reverse.