Silas Peterson v. United States

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 202422-55490California995 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 12 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SILAS BERNARD PETERSON, No. 22-55490

Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. Nos. 5:18-cr-00037-AB-1 v. 2:21-cv-07883-AB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California André Birotte Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 5, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, CALLAHAN, and WALLACH,*** Circuit Judges.

Silas Bernard Peterson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion

under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate his convictions and sentence under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Evan J. Wallach, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.