Romero Ventura v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 202424-13California962 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 12 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA ROMALIA ROMERO No. 24-13 VENTURA; WILSON HUMBERTO Agency Nos.

RAMIREZ ROMERO; DANY ESAU A220-939-736

RAMIREZ ROMERO, A220-939-737

A220-939-738

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 5, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: BRESS and FORREST, Circuit Judges, and OHTA, District Judge.***

Maria Romalia Romero-Ventura and her two children petition for review of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jinsook Ohta, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.