Luis Antonio Villacorta-Orellana v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 13, 202421-70955California729 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 13 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUIS ANTONIO VILLACORTA- No. 21-70955

ORELLANA,

Agency No. A212-997-407 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 6, 2024** Seattle, Washington

Before: W. FLETCHER, BERZON, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Luis Antonio Villacorta-Orellana (“Villacorta”) petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision affirming the immigration judge’s

(“IJ”) denial of his motion to reopen his removal proceedings. We deny the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

1 1. The BIA correctly concluded that Villacorta’s notice of the removal hearing

held on June 28, 2018, comported…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.