People v. Garcia CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 13, 2024G063631California680 words

Opinion

Opinion

Moore, J.

DISCUSSION

“Prior to January 1, 2020, section 667.5, subdivision (b) required trial courts to impose a one-year sentence enhancement for each true finding on an allegation the defendant had served a separate prior prison term and had not remained free of custody for at least five years. [Citation.] Effective

2 Both the petition and the trial court’s order denying the petition

indicate Garcia was identified by the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) as an inmate potentially eligible for relief.

3 January 1, 2020, Senate Bill No. 136 (2019-2020 Reg. Sess.) . . . (Stats. 2019, ch. 590) [(SB 136)] amended section 667.5 by limiting the prior prison term enhancement to only prior terms for sexually violent offenses. [Citations.] Enhancements based on prior prison terms served for other offenses became legally invalid.” (People v. Burgess (2022) 86 Cal.App.5th 375, 379–380.) “Later, in 2021, the Legislature enacted Senate Bill No. 483 (2021-2022 Reg. Sess.) (Senate Bill 483). This bill sought to make the changes implemented by [SB] 136 retroactive. [Citation.] It took effect on January 1, 2022, and added former section 1171.1, now section 1172.75, to the Penal Code.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.