People v. Campos CA2/7

INTRODUCTION

Luis Alonso Jaime Campos appeals from the trial court’s orders revoking his probation in three cases and sentencing him to a total of five years eight months in prison. He argues the trial court abused its discretion in sustaining the prosecutor’s hearsay objections to questions seeking testimony from Campos’s employer that would have supported Campos’s argument he was at work the day of the incident that led to the probation violations. He also argues the abstract of judgment erroneously lists one of his convictions as a violent felony. His first argument is correct, but the court’s error was harmless. His second argument, as the People concede, is also correct. Therefore, we affirm the trial court’s orders and direct the court to correct the error in the abstracts of judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Campos Is Convicted of Committing Various Crimes and Is Placed on Felony Probation in Three Cases Campos was on felony probation for convictions he suffered after pleading no contest to charges in three separate cases. In the first case the court convicted Campos of grand theft of an automobile (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (d)(1))1 and burglary (§ 459).…