Rosa Mejia v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 202422-1918California840 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 16 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA LUZ ROSA MEJIA, et al., No. 22-1918 Agency Nos. Petitioner, A215-782-432; A215-782-433 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued November 6, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and MARQUEZ, District

Judge.

Rosa Mejia (Petitioner), a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order dismissing her appeal of

an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) decision denying her applications for asylum,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture

(CAT). She claims that the BIA’s decision was erroneous…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.