Flores Yanes v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 202422-255California570 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 16 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GLENDA SUYAPA FLORES YANES, No. 22-255 Agency No. Petitioner, A202-128-875 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 11, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: BYBEE, BENNETT, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Glenda Suyapa Flores-Yanes, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for

review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision dismissing an appeal

from the denial by an immigration judge (“IJ”) of her applications for asylum,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

(“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the BIA’s denials

for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.