People v. Hardison CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 16, 2024F085336California8,964 words

Opinion

Opinion

Meehan, J.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant John Glenn Hardison appeals his conviction for first degree murder and related charges. Defendant makes four arguments: (1) the trial court inappropriately denied his second motion pursuant to People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118 (Marsden); (2) the court failed to provide the jury with an instruction related to a heat of passion theory of voluntary manslaughter; (3) the court violated defendant’s constitutional rights when it dismissed Jurors Nos. 9 and 12 for misconduct during deliberations; and (4) relatedly, the dismissal of Jurors Nos. 9 and 12 had a coercive effect on the remaining jurors. We find each of these arguments unpersuasive, and therefore affirm the conviction.

PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

On April 17, 2020, the Kern County District Attorney filed a complaint charging defendant with the murder of Brian Dickerson (Pen. Code § 187, subd. (a); count 1);1 unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon (§ 29800, subd. (a)(1); count 2); unlawful possession of ammunition by a felon (§ 30305, subd. (a)(1); count 3); possession of cocaine while armed with a firearm (Health & Saf. Code, § 11370.1, subd. (a); count 4); and possession of cocaine for sale (Health &…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.