Meredith

Meredith v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 17, 202423-3380California846 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 17 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHARLIE MEREDITH, No. 23-3380

Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:23-cv-00850-BEN-DDL v.

MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY MEMORANDUM*

LLC; MORGAN STANLEY,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 14, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and ROSENTHAL,*** District Judge.

Charlie Meredith appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for an order

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Lee H. Rosenthal, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation. granting his petition to vacate a Financial Industry…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.