Sripetch

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sripetch

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20243:20-cv-01864California1,176 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No.: 20-cv-01864-H-BJC

COMMISSION,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR v. DEFENDANT MICHAEL WEXLER

ONGKARUCK SRIPETCH; AMANDA

[Doc. No. 227.]

FLORES; BREHNEN KNIGHT;

ANDREW MCALPINE, ASHMIT

PATEL; MICHAEL WEXLER;

DOMINIC WILLIAMS; ADTRON INC.

a/k/a STOCKPALOOZA.COM; ATG

INC.; DOIT, LTD.; DOJI CAPITAL,

INC.; KING MUTUAL SOLUTIONS

INC.; OPTIMUS PRIME FINANCIAL

INC.; ORCA BRIDGE; REDLINE

21 INTERNATIONAL; and UAIM CORPORATION, Defendants. 24 On November 14, 2024, Austin Legal Group, APC (“ALG”), counsel for Defendant 25 Michael Wexler in this action, filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for Defendant Wexler. 26 (Doc. No. 227.) On November 18, 2024, Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission 27 (“SEC”) filed a notice of non-opposition to ALG’s motion to withdraw. (Doc. No. 232.) 28 The Court held …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.