Sripetch

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sripetch

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20243:20-cv-01864California9,356 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No.: 20-cv-01864-H-BJC

COMMISSION,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY v. JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT

WEXLER

ONGKARUCK SRIPETCH; AMANDA

FLORES; BREHNEN KNIGHT;

[Doc. No. 218.] ANDREW MCALPINE, ASHMIT

PATEL; MICHAEL WEXLER;

DOMINIC WILLIAMS; ADTRON INC.

a/k/a STOCKPALOOZA.COM; ATG

INC.; DOIT, LTD.; DOJI CAPITAL,

INC.; KING MUTUAL SOLUTIONS

INC.; OPTIMUS PRIME FINANCIAL

INC.; ORCA BRIDGE; REDLINE

21 INTERNATIONAL; and UAIM CORPORATION, Defendants. 24 On November 6, 2024, Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) 25 filed a motion for summary judgment as to liability against Defendant Michael Wexler. 26 (Doc. No. 218.) On November 25, 2024, Defendant Wexler filed a response in 27 28 opposition to the SEC’s motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 239.) On December 6, 2024, the SEC filed a reply. (Doc. No. 243.) 3…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.