Howard
Howard v. Tanium, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANIEL HOWARD, Case No. 21-cv-09703-JSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR TRIAL BY
v. JURY AND MOTION TO AMEND
COMPLAINT
TANIUM, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 66, 70 Defendant.
12 Daniel Howard filed suit against his former employer, Tanium Inc., alleging Tanium fraudulently induced him to join Tanium as an employee. The Court granted Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 48.) The Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded the case. (Dkt. No. 60.) Now pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s motion for a jury trial and motion to amend the complaint. (Dkt. Nos. 66, 70.) Having carefully reviewed the parties’ briefing, and with the benefit of oral argument on December 12, 2024, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for a jury trial and DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to amend. BACKGROUND In November 2021, Plaintiff, a California licensed attorney, sued Defendant for fraud in the San Mateo County Superior…