Branden Markell Wise v. Giselle Matteson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20242:22-cv-04054California1,749 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDON MARKELL WISE, Case No. 2:22-cv-04054-MEMF (AS) 12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GISELLE MATTESON, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Magistrate Judge’s Report recommends the denial of habeas relief for Petitioner’s claims challenging his convictions for first-degree murder and attempted murder. (Dkt. No. 36). For the following reasons, Petitioner’s objections to the Report (Dkt. No. 37) do not warrant a change to the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendation. Petitioner objects that the California Court of Appeal misrepresented the sequence of events regarding Petitioner’s contact with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.