Hearn

Hearn v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20243:22-cv-00255California6,246 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 WILLIAM HEARN, Case No.: 22-cv-255-AGS-DDL

Plaintiff,

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

v. FOR ORDER GRANTING IN PART

AND DENYING IN PART

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

WARDEN, et al., PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

Defendants.

[Dkt. No. 77]

17 The undersigned respectfully submits this Report and Recommendation to United States District Judge Andrew G. Schopler pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Civil Local Rule 72.3. Plaintiff William Hearn, an inmate at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”), is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges Defendants violated his First and Eighth Amendment rights. See generally Dkt. No. 53. Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (the “Motion to Dismiss”) by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.