Hearn
Hearn v. Warden
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 WILLIAM HEARN, Case No.: 22-cv-255-AGS-DDL
Plaintiff,
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
v. FOR ORDER GRANTING IN PART
AND DENYING IN PART
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
WARDEN, et al., PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Defendants.
[Dkt. No. 77]
17 The undersigned respectfully submits this Report and Recommendation to United States District Judge Andrew G. Schopler pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Civil Local Rule 72.3. Plaintiff William Hearn, an inmate at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”), is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges Defendants violated his First and Eighth Amendment rights. See generally Dkt. No. 53. Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (the “Motion to Dismiss”) by…