Hudson
Hudson v. Regency Air CA4/3
Opinion
Opinion
Motoike, J.
Filed 12/17/24 Hudson v. Regency Air CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
ALEXA HUDSON,
Plaintiff and Appellant, G062534
v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2020- 01143610)
REGENCY AIR, LLC,
OPINION
Defendant and Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, James L. Crandall, Judge. Affirmed. Law Office of Corbett H. Williams and Corbett H. Williams for Plaintiff and Appellant. Cone & Kassel and John A. Cone, Jr., for Defendant and Respondent. Plaintiff Alexa Hudson was employed by defendant Regency Air, LLC (Regency Air), where she was paid a salary, worked Monday through Friday in the office, and sometimes was on call during the weekend. Following a bench trial, the trial…