Ahmed

Ahmed v. Wormuth

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20243:22-cv-04365California11,240 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EHAB AHMED, Case No. 22-cv-04365-TSH

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER

REFERRING PARTIES FOR

CHRISTINE WORMUTH, SECRETARY, FURTHER SETTLEMENT

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, CONFERENCE

11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 50 12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Ehab Ahmed brings this Title VII case alleging discrimination based on his race and religion, as well as retaliation for participating in protected activity. Pending before the Court is Defendant Christine Wormuth’s Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 50. Ahmed filed an Opposition (ECF No. 65) and Wormuth filed a Reply (ECF No. 67). The Court finds this motion suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the December 12, 2024 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion.1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.