Hipschman
Hipschman v. County of San Diego
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 3:22-cv-0903 AJB (BLM) CAROLINA HIPSCHMAN, an individual;
ALEX HIPSCHMAN, an individual, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ Plaintiffs, MOTION TO COMPEL 13 v. [ECF No. 125]
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., 15 Defendants.
18 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ November 18, 2024 Motion to Compel Defendant County of San Diego to Provide Training Materials (“MTC”). ECF No. 125. On December 2, 2024, Defendant County of San Diego (“County”) filed an Opposition (“Oppo.”). ECF No. 128. On December 9, 2024, Plaintiffs filed their Reply (“Reply”). ECF No. 136. After reviewing Plaintiffs’ MTC, the County’s Oppo, Plaintiffs’ Reply and all supporting documents, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion for the reasons set forth below. RELEVANT BACKGROUND On June 21, 2022, Plaintiffs initiated this action alleging, , that Defendants County of San Diego, Nidia Romero, Elizabeth Samuels, Jose Padilla, and Mary…