LeGrand
LeGrand v. Abbott Laboratories
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CONDALISA LEGRAND, Case No. 22-cv-05815-TSH
Plaintiff,
DISCOVERY ORDER
v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 107, 108, 109 ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Defendant.
12 The parties have three discovery disputes. ECF Nos. 107, 108 and 109. The Court rules as follows. A. ECF No. 107 (Plaintiff’s Initial Disclosures) Abbott contends that Plaintiff’s initial disclosures do not adequately disclose Plaintiff’s damages claims. Rule 26(a)(1)(A)(iii) requires “a computation of each category of damages claimed by the disclosing party – who must also make available for inspection and copying as under Rule 34 the documents or other evidentiary material, unless privileged or protected from disclosure, on which each computation is based, including materials bearing on the nature and extent of injuries suffered . . .” Plaintiff’s initial disclosures say the following concerning damages: