LeGrand

LeGrand v. Abbott Laboratories

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20243:22-cv-05815California1,288 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CONDALISA LEGRAND, Case No. 22-cv-05815-TSH

Plaintiff,

DISCOVERY ORDER

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 107, 108, 109 ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Defendant.

12 The parties have three discovery disputes. ECF Nos. 107, 108 and 109. The Court rules as follows. A. ECF No. 107 (Plaintiff’s Initial Disclosures) Abbott contends that Plaintiff’s initial disclosures do not adequately disclose Plaintiff’s damages claims. Rule 26(a)(1)(A)(iii) requires “a computation of each category of damages claimed by the disclosing party – who must also make available for inspection and copying as under Rule 34 the documents or other evidentiary material, unless privileged or protected from disclosure, on which each computation is based, including materials bearing on the nature and extent of injuries suffered . . .” Plaintiff’s initial disclosures say the following concerning damages:

Without waiver of calculations of additional categories of damages,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.