Diaz

(PC) Miller v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20241:20-cv-01243California1,339 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CURTIS MILLER, Case No. 1:20-cv-01243-KES-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF’S

v. DEPOSITION

RALPH DIAZ, et al., (Doc. No. 39)

Defendants. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO MODIFY DISCOVERY

DEADLINES TO THE EXTENT SET FORTH

HEREIN

17 (Doc. No. 40) 18 Pending before the Court are Defendants’ Motion to Compel Plaintiff’s Deposition and Motion to Modify Discovery Deadline and Vacate Remaining Case Management Deadlines filed on November 22, 2024. (Doc. Nos. 39, 40). Plaintiff did not file an opposition or statement of no opposition to either motion and the time to do so has expired. See Local Rule 230(l). The Court deems Plaintiff’s non-response as a waiver of his opposition to both motions. Id. Plaintiff, a former prisoner, proceeds pro se in this civil rights action on his complaint alleging an Eighth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.