Ralon

Ralon v. Kaiser Permanente Hospital

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20243:23-cv-03344California1,146 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOMITILA PELAEZ RALON,

Case No. 23-cv-03344-JCS Plaintiff, 10 v. ORDER RE KAISER DISCOVERY LETTER

KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN,

INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 61 Defendants.

14 The Court is in receipt of Kaiser’s discovery letter (dkt. no. 61) (“Letter”). This Court’s Civil Standing Orders establish a procedure for bringing discovery disputes to the Court’s attention that requires the parties to meet and confer and file a joint letter setting forth the parties’ positions. However, Kaiser represents that it has been unable to engage in that process because Plaintiff has refused to respond to telephone message and letters seeking to meet and confer and has failed to provide an email address to facilitate communication despite repeated requests by Kaiser’s counsel. Because Kaiser asks the Court to quash a deposition subpoena for a deposition Plaintiff has noticed for Monday,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.