Ralon
Ralon v. Kaiser Permanente Hospital
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DOMITILA PELAEZ RALON,
Case No. 23-cv-03344-JCS Plaintiff, 10 v. ORDER RE KAISER DISCOVERY LETTER
KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN,
INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 61 Defendants.
14 The Court is in receipt of Kaiser’s discovery letter (dkt. no. 61) (“Letter”). This Court’s Civil Standing Orders establish a procedure for bringing discovery disputes to the Court’s attention that requires the parties to meet and confer and file a joint letter setting forth the parties’ positions. However, Kaiser represents that it has been unable to engage in that process because Plaintiff has refused to respond to telephone message and letters seeking to meet and confer and has failed to provide an email address to facilitate communication despite repeated requests by Kaiser’s counsel. Because Kaiser asks the Court to quash a deposition subpoena for a deposition Plaintiff has noticed for Monday,…