Baraona

(PC) Puckett v. Baraona

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20241:21-cv-01448California495 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, Case No. 1:21-cv-01448-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO ENTER DEFAULT JUDGMENT

v. (ECF No. 110) BARAONA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Durrell Anthony Puckett (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against: (1) Defendants Baraona, Burnitzki,1 Leos, Hernandez, and Diaz for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment; (2) Defendants Leos for sexual assault in violation of the Eighth Amendment; and (3) Defendants A. Ruiz, E. Ruiz, Meier,2 Gutierrez, Allison (Cronister), and Price for failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is briefed and pending before the Court. (ECF Nos. 71–73.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion requesting that the Court enter default judgment,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.