California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform v. Prudential Insurance Company of America

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CALIFORNIA ADVOCATES FOR Case No. 24-cv-01119-AMO

NURSING HOME REFORM,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE MOTION TO REMAND 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 18 10

PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY

11 OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. 12 13 14 Before the Court is Plaintiff California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform’s 15 (“CANHR”) motion to remand. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral 16 argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for July 19, 2024, was VACATED. See Civ. L.R. 7-6. 17 Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal 18 authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS CANHR’s motion, for the 19 following reasons. 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 A. Factual Background 22 CANHR helped draft and enact California Insurance Code sections 10113.71 and 10113.72 23 (the “Statutes”), which became effective January 1, 2013. Compl. (ECF 1-1) ¶¶ 23-24. CANHR 24 then spent and devoted significant staff time and other resources to…