Palma

Palma v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20243:24-cv-02618California1,526 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 HELEN PALMA, Case No. 24-cv-02618-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE ARBITRATION AND

v. STAY

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL

ASSOCIATION,

8 Defendant.

9 As alleged in the complaint, defendant Wells Fargo obtained a judgment “several years ago” against plaintiff Helen Palma for credit card debt. Dkt. No. 1-1 ¶ 11. In February 2023, Wells Fargo withdrew money from Palma’s checking and savings accounts apparently to offset her credit card balance owed to the bank. Id. ¶¶ 14-15. Palma alleges that this conduct violated the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., and a variety of California state statutory and common law provisions. Palma sued in California state court on behalf of herself and a putative class of Wells Fargo customers in California. After removing the case to this Court on federal question jurisdiction, Dkt. No. 1, which Palma did not challenge, Wells Fargo promptly moved to send the lawsuit to arbitration, Dkt. No. 12. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.