McMillan

McMillan v. Highland Hospital Doctor and Nurses

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20243:24-cv-04655California812 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JARVIS EDUARDO MCMILLAN, Case No. 24-cv-04655-TLT

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

HIGHLAND HOSPITAL DOCTORS AND

NURSES,

11 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se complaint against Highland Hospital doctors and nurses under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF 1. The complaint is now before the Court for screening pursuant to pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. For the reasons identified below, the complaint is dismissed. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.