Armstrong

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20243:24-cv-05580California506 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENNIS L. ARMSTRONG,

Case No. 24-cv-05580-RS (PR) Petitioner, 9 v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL

ROB ST. ANDRE,

11 Respondent.

13 INTRODUCTION Petitioner has filed a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in which he challenges the same state court judgment he challenged in a prior section 2254 habeas action he filed in this district, Armstrong v. Runnels, No. 03-cv-03374-SI. The present petition will be dismissed as second or successive to the prior petition. Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) is GRANTED. (Dkt. No. 14.) BACKGROUND The first habeas petition challenged the 2000 California state convictions petitioner received in the Alameda County Superior Court for robbery, for which he received a sentence of 31 years and four months. The petition was denied on the merits. (Armstrong v. Runnels, No. 03-cv-03374-SI, Dkt. No. 13.) His appeal of this denial was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.