Joseph Gatt v. George Gascon

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20242:24-cv-02740California5,761 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP

RONALD L. CHENG (SBN 138892)

Ronald.Cheng@pillsburylaw.com

PHILIP HE (SBN 322811)

Philip.He@pillsburylaw.com 725 South Figueroa Street, 36th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017-5524 Telephone: 213.488.7100 Facsimile: 213.629.1033

Attorneys for Defendants

LOS ANGELES COUNTY,

GEORGE GASCÓN, and ANGELA BRUNSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1100

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1111

1122 JOSEPH GATT, Case No. 2:24-cv-02740-FLA-AGR

1133 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND 1144 PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: vs.

DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL

1155

GEORGE GASCÓN, INFORMATION

1166 LOS ANGELES COUNTY, 1177 ANGELA BRUNSON,

DENOS AMARANTOS,

1188 THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, and 1199 DOES 1-10, Defendants. 2200 2211 2222

2233 2244 2255 2266 2277 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.