Tapia

(PC) Solomon v. Tapia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20241:22-cv-01604California1,453 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KING SOLOMON, Case No. 1:22-cv-01604-KES-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER RE: PRODUCTION OF

DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR IN

v. CAMERA REVIEW

PRADA and TAPIA, (Doc. No. 40) Defendants. 16 On December 4, 2024, the Court granted in part Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery and ordered Defendants to submit for in camera review certain documents for which Defendants asserted official information privilege. (Doc. No. 40). Pursuant to that Order, Defendants submitted to the Court both redacted and unredacted documents related to the investigation, seven audio recordings, and one video recording. Upon review of the materials submitted, the Court finds that the redacted “AIMS Report” and the redacted documentary and audio-video exhibits to the investigation are sufficiently relevant to Plaintiff’s claims to outweigh the government’s interest in the confidentiality of those records. Thus, the Court will order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.