John Doe v. County of Santa Barbara

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20242:24-cv-04334California4,597 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

MARK R. PACHOWICZ (SBN 138108) mark@pglaw.law

JENNIE HENDRICKSON (SBN 144562)

3 jennie@pglaw.law PACHOWICZ GOLDENRING A Professional Law Corporation 5 6050 Seahawk Street Ventura, California 93003-6622 Telephone: (805) 642-6702 7 Facsimile: (805) 642-3145 8 Attorney for Defendant JOSHUA ELIZALDE 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 12 JANE DOE, Case No. 2:24-cv-04334-MEMF (SKx)

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

Plaintiff, ORDER vs. Assigned to: Hon. Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong 16 COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA; Magistrate Judge Steve Kim JOSHUA ELIZALDE; and JOHN FAC filed: August 9, 2024

DOES 1-10,

DISCOVERY MATTER

Defendants. 20 ALL PARTIES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL, STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.