Clark v. Oakland Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20243:24-cv-07982California3,037 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division LOUREECE STONE CLARK, et al., Case No. 24-cv-07982-LB

Plaintiffs, SCREENING ORDER v. Re: ECF No.

OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 INTRODUCTION The plaintiff Loureece Stone Clark, who represents himself and is proceeding in forma pauperis, sued the Oakland Police Department and others. Generally he alleges violations of the Supremacy and Takings Clauses of the United States Constitution, possibly by his participation in court proceedings and possibly with reference to a Wells Fargo Bank account, and also references a breach of contract and a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 2333, which allows victims of international terrorism to file a suit in federal court to recover damages for their injuries.1 Before directing the United States Marshal to serve the defendant with the complaint, the court must screen it for

1 Compl. – ECF No. 1 at 1; Civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.