(PC)Coleman
(PC)Coleman v. Moore
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20241:23-cv-00324California906 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAAHDI ABDUL COLEMAN, Case No.: 1:23-cv-00324-KES-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS FOR
v. PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO OBEY
LOCAL RULES AND FAILURE TO
MOORE, et al., PROSECUTE
Defendants. (Doc. 9)
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEFENDANTS
14-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE
Plaintiff Saahdi Abdul Coleman is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. I. INTRODUCTION On November 6, 2024, the Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 7.) It determined Plaintiff had plausibly alleged Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendants Bean, Crawford, Doe 1, Doe 2, McDaniel, Moore, Russell, and Vasquez, but failed to allege any other…