(PC)Coleman

(PC)Coleman v. Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20241:23-cv-00324California906 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAAHDI ABDUL COLEMAN, Case No.: 1:23-cv-00324-KES-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS FOR

v. PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO OBEY

LOCAL RULES AND FAILURE TO

MOORE, et al., PROSECUTE

Defendants. (Doc. 9)

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

DEFENDANTS

14-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE

Plaintiff Saahdi Abdul Coleman is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. I. INTRODUCTION On November 6, 2024, the Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 7.) It determined Plaintiff had plausibly alleged Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendants Bean, Crawford, Doe 1, Doe 2, McDaniel, Moore, Russell, and Vasquez, but failed to allege any other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.