Gastelum

Gastelum v. Hie River Park LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20241:23-cv-00472California519 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No. 1:23-cv-00472-JLT-SKO

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

v. ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

RECOMMENDED FOR DISMISSAL

AND VACATING SCHEDULING HIE RIVER PARK LLC dba Holiday Inn CONFERENCE Express Fresno Riverpark, (Doc. 21) Defendant.

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

_____________________________________/ 15 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the complaint in this action on 17 March 28, 2023. (Docs. 1, 2, 3, & 4.) 18 On September 10, 2024, the Court issued an order directing Plaintiff to file a status report 19 indicating whether they contend to continue to prosecute this case by no later than December 10, 20 2024. (Doc. 21.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed a status report or requested an extension of time 21 within which to do so. 22 The Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 23 corresponding with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, provide, “[f]ailure of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.