Burns
(PC) Jaramillo v. Burns
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUDIE JARAMILLO, Case No.: 1:23-cv-0666 JLT CDB Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING
v. CERTAIN DEFENDANTS, AND DIRECTING
THE CLERK OF COURT TO UPDATE THE
JOSEPH BURNES, et al., DOCKET
Defendants. (Doc. 18)
16 Rudie Jaramillo seeks to hold the defendants liable for civil rights violations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and found Plaintiff stated cognizable claims for Eighth Amendment excessive force and First Amendment retaliation claims against Defendants Barrett, Bartolo, Burnes, Garcia, Hernandez, Rodriguez, and Ruiz. (Doc. 18 at 4-10.) However, the magistrate judge found Plaintiff did not state cognizable claims against J. Contreras and R. Villanueva-Garcia. (Id. at 8, 9-10.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the Court dismiss Contreras and Villanueva-Garcia as defendants and…